Forests, Poachers, and the King’s Deer

Forests, Poachers, and the King’s Deer

Every good medieval story needs a forest full of secrets, and it turns out the real medieval forest was already doing quite a lot of narrative heavy lifting on its own — mostly involving furious arguments about deer.

England’s royal forests weren’t simply woodland; they included pastures, fields, and even whole villages, all governed by their own dedicated laws and courts, entirely separate from the ordinary manorial system. Hunting or harming “venison” (the umbrella term for the big game animals — fallow deer, red deer, roe deer, and wild boar) without royal permission was strictly forbidden, and so, for good measure, was harming the trees and undergrowth that fed and sheltered them. You could get in trouble for disturbing a deer’s lunch.

The bureaucracy built around protecting these animals was genuinely elaborate: chief justices of the forest, itinerant justices who toured on an “eyre,” local wardens, and foresters-of-fee who tracked down poachers and criminals living rough in the woods. Offences were split between the verderers’ court (which handled minor matters and could fine up to four pence) and the far more serious eyre of the itinerant justices, which handled anything involving venison — and which, until 1217, could sentence poachers to death or maiming. After 1217 the going rate dropped to mere imprisonment or a fine, which is either progress or simply a sign that the crown had run out of patience for executing quite so many peasants over a deer.

If you’re plotting a story with a poacher hero, the stakes were entirely real, and so was the vast, resentful bureaucracy standing between him and dinner.


Discover The Draychester Chronicles medieval mystery series on Amazon.